OooOoOo, Look what I received yesterday. So, I really can take this two different ways.

1: The D.A. agrees with my stance that the court error’d in interpreting the Statues CVC 40801-40805 / CEC 1271(C), Doubtful 2: They don’t give two structured object’s about traffic cases and will leave it to the justices to reverse if there was indeed a legal error, More likely.

However, in any case, it’s best that they didn’t respond with a rebuttal and hey, this saves me from having to do an oral argument in front of the Justice Panel, which I wouldn’t of minded for the learning experience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To create code blocks or other preformatted text, indent by four spaces:

    This will be displayed in a monospaced font. The first four 
    spaces will be stripped off, but all other whitespace
    will be preserved.
    
    Markdown is turned off in code blocks:
     [This is not a link](http://example.com)

To create not a block, but an inline code span, use backticks:

Here is some inline `code`.

For more help see http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax