OooOoOo, Look what I received yesterday. So, I really can take this two different ways.

1: The D.A. agrees with my stance that the court error’d in interpreting the Statues CVC 40801-40805 / CEC 1271(C), Doubtful 2: They don’t give two structured object’s about traffic cases and will leave it to the justices to reverse if there was indeed a legal error, More likely.

However, in any case, it’s best that they didn’t respond with a rebuttal and hey, this saves me from having to do an oral argument in front of the Justice Panel, which I wouldn’t of minded for the learning experience.

Previous Post: http://controllingtheinter.net/2018/02/27/traffic-court-cvc-22350-basic-speed-law-continued-appellants-opening-brief/

Update: http://controllingtheinter.net/2018/06/18/waiting-on-results-from-appeal/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *