OooOoOo, Look what I received yesterday. So, I really can take this two different ways.
1: The D.A. agrees with my stance that the court error’d in interpreting the Statues CVC 40801-40805 / CEC 1271(C), Doubtful 2: They don’t give two structured object’s about traffic cases and will leave it to the justices to reverse if there was indeed a legal error, More likely.
However, in any case, it’s best that they didn’t respond with a rebuttal and hey, this saves me from having to do an oral argument in front of the Justice Panel, which I wouldn’t of minded for the learning experience.